Saturday, March 24, 2012

Radiation treatments create cancer cells 30 times more potent than regular cancer

Radiation treatments create cancer cells 30 times more potent than regular cancer

  • The Alex Jones Channel Alex Jones Show podcast Prison Planet TV Twitter Alex Jones' Facebook Infowars store

Tony Isaacs
March 20, 2012

In a groundbreaking new study just published in the peer reviewed journal Stem Cells, researchers at UCLA’s Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Department of Oncology found that, despite killing half of all tumor cells per treatment, radiation treatments on breast cancer transforms other cancer cells into cancer stem cells which are vastly more treatment-resistant than normal cancer cells. The new study is yet another blow to the failed and favored mainstream treatment paradigm of trying to cut out, poison out or burn out cancer symptoms (tumors) instead of actually curing cancer.

Senior study author Dr. Frank Pajonk, associate professor of radiation oncology at the Jonsson Center, reported that induced breast cancer stem cells (iBCSC) “were generated by radiation-induced activation of the same cellular pathways used to reprogram normal cells into induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) in regenerative medicine.” Pjonk, who is also a scientist with the Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine at UCLA, added “It was remarkable that these breast cancers used the same reprogramming pathways to fight back against the radiation treatment.”

In the new study, Pajonk and his team irradiated normal non-stem cell cancer cells and placed them into mice. Through a unique imaging system, the researchers observed the cells differentiate into iBCSC in response to radiation treatments. Pjonk reported that the newly generated cells were remarkably similar to non-irradiated breast cancer stem cells. The team of researchers also found that the radiation-induced stem cells had a more than 30-fold increased ability to form tumors compared with non-irradiated breast cancer cells.

Despite mounting evidence, mainstream medicine clings to surgery, chemo and radiation and ignores natural solutions

Despite all the billions of dollars spent on cancer, the 40 year “war on cancer” has been a losing one by any honest evaluation. One hundred years ago, anywhere from 1 in 50 to perhaps 1 in 100 people could be expected to develop cancer. Now it is estimated that 1 in every 2 men and 1 in every 3 women will be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetimes. Despite more people around the world developing cancer and dying from cancer every year, mainstream medicine continues to cling to failed treatments which more often than not fail to eliminate the cancer and help cancer spread and return more aggressively than ever. Notably, two of the three major mainstream cancer treatments – radiation and chemo – are themselves highly carcinogenic.

One might think that the new study provided ample reasons to rethink using radiation. However, the study authors looked at the results as an opportunity to continue and enhance the use of radiation by finding ways to control the cell differentiation. What the scientists failed to note is that natural alternatives have already been found which prevent the development of cancer stem cells.

As just one example, Natural News reported in May 2010 that a University of Michigan study had found a compound in broccoli and broccoli sprouts which had the ability to target cancer stem cells. See:

The researchers failed to note how cancer cells fought against unnatural treatments. They also failed to take into account the mounting evidence that the best way to beat cancer as well as avoid it is to build and enhance our natural first line of defense – our immune system.

The safest and most effective way to enhance the natural immune system and fight cancer in general is by working with nature. It is also by far the least expensive way, and therein likely lies the rub. You can’t patent and profit from nature like you can with mainstream drugs and treatments.

Note: Neither NaturalNews nor this author condone the inhumane use of animals in medical studies.

Other sources included:

This article was originally published on Natural News.


  1. Dear Sir

    I have been diagnosed with follicular lymphoma stage 4. This has also moved into my bone marrow and my liver. I have had five chemotherapy treatments, and will shortly be having the sixth. My oncologist has informed me that medically there is no cure for the cancer which I have, and the best they can hope to do is to shrink the cancer for a while.
    I have been interested in Rick Simpson's oil for some time. I have two questions:
    1) Benzine. I have been informed that naphtha / benzine contains carcinogens. Does this mean the carcinogens are in the fumes benzine releases, or is there a residue when using benzine in the production of Rick Simpson oil, which is carcinogenic?
    2) What is the 'shelf-life' of Rick Simpson oil?
    I would be most grateful for feedback.
    Best regards,

  2. hi,

    use alcohol dont use the nafta as there are indications that it is carcinogenic...
    You must understand that there are many ways of curring cancer, besides the cannabis I will suggest you also change your diet eating only raw food!
    Also its very important that you eat at least 2000mg of organic vitamin c every day.
    If you can get your doctor to inject vitamin c intravenous 24,000 to 42,000 milligrams) of vitamin c per day.

    contact me if you need further info

  3. Now if you don't know what MJ is, well, I doubt you care about the issue here.. however perhaps you do.. I mean the national deficit would be paid off completely in one year if they just let the pot heads out of jail!!! It costs 120,000 dollars to keep a person in prison for 1 year.

    hvac training CA